1. Knowledge Mastery (40 points):
    • Correctly defines fundamental concepts such as data privacy, academic integrity, etc., and explains their significance.
    • Lists and explains at least two important data protection regulations and two common cyber threats.
    • Demonstrates understanding of multi-factor authentication principles and applications, explaining its advantages.
    • Familiar with at least two appropriate academic writing citation methods and techniques to prevent plagiarism.
  2. Application and Understanding (30 points):
    • Applies data protection principles to propose best practices for personal data privacy and explains their impact.
    • Provides cybersecurity recommendations tailored to specific scenarios (e.g., cybersecurity for a small business).
    • Illustrates how to properly cite and avoid plagiarism in academic writing to uphold academic integrity.
  3. Analysis and Critical Thinking (20 points):
    • Analyzes the relationship between data privacy and academic integrity, explaining the impact of data privacy on academic research.
    • Analyzes and evaluates data privacy and cybersecurity issues in given contexts, offering reasonable solutions.
  4. Writing Expression (10 points):
    • Provides clear, concise answers to questions, with accurate expression, and free of grammar and spelling errors.
    • In the essay question, organizes the essay coherently, with a clear structure and well-supported arguments.

Total Score: 100 points

  • 90-100 points: Excellent, demonstrates comprehensive knowledge of the course content, with deep understanding and flexible application of knowledge.
  • 80-89 points: Good, shows a solid grasp of the course content, with reasonable application of knowledge.
  • 70-79 points: Average, demonstrates moderate understanding of the course content, needs to strengthen practice and comprehension.
  • 60-69 points: Pass, exhibits weak grasp of the course content, requires more learning and review.
  • 0-59 points: Fail, lacks sufficient understanding of the course content, needs comprehensive review and improvement.